*May 24, 2012, 11:45:43 AM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 24, 2012, 11:45:43 AM

Login with username, password and session length
8458 Posts in 1523 Topics by 1842 Members - Latest Member: kkkiii
There are some photographers who are just pressing a button. And then there are the others who see the world in a very different way...
Search:     Advanced search
Photography Thailand Forum
* Home Help Search Gallery Login Register
Recent Pictures

Views: 27
Comments (0)
By: Marc Schultz

Views: 39
Comments (1)
By: Marc Schultz

Views: 117
Comments (1)
By: bjorn slis

Views: 61
Comments (0)
By: tony121
0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Send this topic Print
Author Topic: If you think your lenses are too heavy...  (Read 1133 times)
Marc Schultz
Forum Administrator
Big Kahuna 1,000+
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1788



WWW
« on: September 17, 2006, 10:10:35 AM »

Hre is one that is 256KG!

http://www.zeiss.com/c12567a8003b58b9/Contents-Frame/8baac109cb80bddfc12571e100393a1b
Logged

Chris Savery
Big Kahuna
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 236



WWW
« Reply #1 on: September 17, 2006, 07:45:58 PM »

Ah, gee. Yet another one to add to the buy list. And will need a Jeep to go with it too.
Since that's for a Hasselblad I wonder what the equivalent focal length is on a DSLR. My guess is they had to spend an incrediable amount of money to just get something like the 1200mm Canon in focal length.
Said it's for wildlife but I bet it's the CIA myself...
Chris :)
Logged
Marc Schultz
Forum Administrator
Big Kahuna 1,000+
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1788



WWW
« Reply #2 on: September 17, 2006, 09:16:32 PM »

For comparatively less money I guess one could buy the Canon 600mm lens which, on a DSLR like the 30D that has a 1.6 crop factor, would give you a focal length of over 800mm. It is still 30% less focal length than the Hasselblad 1,200mm lens, but once you take into account the 35mm equivalent it probably works out to the same thing. You could also use that 600mm with a 2x extender and the 30D and you are way over the 1,200 focal length. Of course there will be some sacrifice in sharpness, but would be hard to notice it under most applications.
Logged

gregoire
Big Kahuna
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 191



WWW
« Reply #3 on: September 17, 2006, 09:46:01 PM »

And then you need to treck for hours or take hot air balloons just to get far enough from what you want to shoot Wink
Logged

Marc Schultz
Forum Administrator
Big Kahuna 1,000+
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 1788



WWW
« Reply #4 on: September 17, 2006, 10:06:14 PM »

You also need a chain-hoist to carry the lens for you  Cool
Logged

mahonyWeb
Junior Kahuna
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 90



« Reply #5 on: October 03, 2006, 07:01:13 PM »

I think it's the constant f4 which makes this such a monster.

Imagine the bokeh 1700mm @ f4  Shocked  Grin
Logged
Pages: [1] Go Up Send this topic Print
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines
Themis design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!