*May 22, 2012, 02:10:58 AM
Welcome, Guest. Please login or register.
Did you miss your activation email?
May 22, 2012, 02:10:58 AM

Login with username, password and session length
8452 Posts in 1522 Topics by 1842 Members - Latest Member: kkkiii
There are some photographers who are just pressing a button. And then there are the others who see the world in a very different way...
Search:     Advanced search
Photography Thailand Forum
* Home Help Search Gallery Login Register
Recent Pictures

Views: 25
Comments (0)
By: Marc Schultz

Views: 31
Comments (0)
By: Marc Schultz

Views: 113
Comments (1)
By: bjorn slis

Views: 54
Comments (0)
By: tony121
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic. « previous next »
Pages: [1] Go Down Send this topic Print
Author Topic: Comments about Sigma 17-55 2.8  (Read 726 times)
boraborasands
Baby Kahuna
**
Offline Offline

Posts: 6


« on: November 09, 2007, 03:00:10 PM »

I am looking to get the above zoom, and would be glad to hear some comments whether negative or positiv about this lense.

As the Nikon 17-55 is actually much pricier, i heard it is a good deal for a good quality though..

Thanks,

Logged
epixx
Big Kahuna
*****
Offline Offline

Gender: Male
Posts: 209



WWW
« Reply #1 on: November 09, 2007, 04:45:58 PM »

I believe the Sigma is 18-50. From what I've heard, the Tamron 17-50 is a bit better, but I own neither, so take it for what it's worth   Roll Eyes
Logged
Gus
Junior Kahuna
***
Offline Offline

Posts: 48


WWW
« Reply #2 on: November 10, 2007, 09:29:55 PM »

Timely post.  My latest edition of Digital Photo has a test on all of these lenses.  The comparison was between the Canon 17-55, Nikon 17-55, Pentax 16-50, Sigma 17-55 and Tamron 17-70.

They awarded the Gold Award to the Sigma 18-50 and the Silver award to the Nikon 17-55.  Although the Nikon was the superior lensein ourtright performance the Sigma was chosen because it represented excellent value for money.  They rated it superior to the Tamron lense in Features and build and Performance, but all were inferior in Image quality to the Nikon, but the Nikon is significantly more expesive.  The Nikon was the only lens to be give a five star rating for Features and Build, Perfmance, and Image quality.  The only thing they rated it down on was value for money.

Hope this helps.  You would be able to buy the Magazine at one of the bigger News Agencies,/bookshops in bangkok if you are interested in reading the review.

Regards

Gus
Logged

Pages: [1] Go Up Send this topic Print
« previous next »
Jump to:  

Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.16 | SMF © 2006, Simple Machines
Themis design by Bloc
Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!